??? 09/19/08 16:29 Read: times |
#158395 - Assertion and Negation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I’m fond of the terminology promoted by Motorola (now Freescale). This is to refer to all logic in terms of assert/asserted/assertion (true) and negate/negated/negation (false). Any input or output term may be active high or active low, but the logic is easily described no matter what the active level(s) are. For example, an AND gate output is asserted iff both inputs are asserted. It's a detail of the circuitry to decide the active level of the output and the inputs, and to construct the logic appropriately. |
Topic | Author | Date |
negartive and positive logic ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So what?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Language??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
deMorgan ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
deMorgan states pos AND = neg OR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is there a contradiction here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NO!, it is a negative NOR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't follow ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
negative logic / means TRUE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
/ means NOT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Negative input NOR = Negative OR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have never heard of | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NAND and NOR fuzzy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Negative In - Positive Out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"drawn as" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's semantics ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Assertion and Negation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
things have changed ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Something to live with | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT: Freescale![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |