| ??? 09/27/08 12:34 Read: times |
#158618 - i think to recall .... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... that the 66x specs state RAM as a TOTAL (RAM and XRAM) thus the XRAM would not be 0x800 but 0x700.
another possibility is, of course, that someone sold you a clone. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| memory handling - uC P89C669 On-Chip XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| please send your code that handles hdata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART0 of LPC2148 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A new thread would be a good idea... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think to recall .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| '669 is DIFFERENT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 669 EOL? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hard to say, but I would be cautious at least | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where are the ST LPCs? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are free to draw your own conclusions | 01/01/70 00:00 |



