Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/20/02 08:28
Read: times


 
#27552 - RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl
I have never found any language that is self documenting I once worked for a major company in the pro audio busness that had that maxim. I wasted days and possibly weeks trying to get things working becuse there was no software desingn stratergy documentation and poor comments. That sofware was (is?) written is pascall.
I will chuck my words in the debate about code standards:
Make subroutine/function/procedure names desciptive but short witout being too criptic
Comment each line of assembler exept where it would be banal
Place a short decription of operation of each subroutine/function/procedure above the code and (abridged version) in "extern" lists
The main loop should be an understandable series of calls use only necessary code at this level
Use of upper and lower case should be consistent and helpfull
The acid test is to maintain code ten years old and no wonder what you where taking when you wrote it


List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
Useage of nops            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Useage of nops            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
Nic, sorry you don't like my            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Nic, sorry you don't like my            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
What Nic didn't say            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What Nic didn't say            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Nic, sorry you don't like my            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl            01/01/70 00:00      
Apology gladly accepted            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Apology gladly accepted            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What Nic didn't say, keith            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: John Deans            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: What is ugly and what not in assembl            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Ijaz            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List