| ??? 10/02/02 11:13 Read: times |
#30018 - RE: Laser animation |
or maybe switch to 251
If you are going to use a "16 bit '51" go for the XA, it is orders of magnitude more versatile then the 251. Intel were so busy keeping the 251 "object compatible" that they had to forgo most improvements possible. Philips went "source compatible" and thus had the freedom to do it right. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation, vesicular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation, vesicular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation, vesicular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation, vesicular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation, vesicular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation, vesicular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Laser animation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Laser animation- Alfredi | 01/01/70 00:00 |