| ??? 10/23/02 08:07 Read: times |
#31274 - RE: Yeah right. I overlooked some part. |
For only 256 different values, the table method looks the best and no need to add a floating point library.
E.g. on using a single floating point variable on the keil, the code was growing up to 2kB more. Thus a table of 768 byte was more effective and over 100 times faster. Are you familiar with using lookup tables on the 8051 ? Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Regarding Look-Up Tables... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Regarding Look-Up Tables... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Regarding Look-Up Tables... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Regarding Look-Up Tables... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Regarding Look-Up Tables... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yeah right. I overlooked some part. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Yeah right. I overlooked some part. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Yeah right. I overlooked some part. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Yeah right. I overlooked some part. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Yeah right. I overlooked some part. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Yeah right. I overlooked some part. | 01/01/70 00:00 |



