Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/04/03 16:54
Read: times


 
#35603 - RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65
Anyway Erik,don't be so hard on the poor lad.There is a danger of becoming like a unix support group,every question gets the reply'R.T.F.M'

No way, I do issue RTFMs when the FM describes it better than me or when the question show a total ignorance of the basic workings of the '51, not just lack of understanding of a specific point.

As far as handles go, my main objection is that when they sneak in suddenly you see the obscene ones as jez points out one of, not to mention the grossly obscene we saw a month or two ago. To censure handles and allow only non-obscene ones would be unrealistic, thus I totally support the no handles policy. If anyone want to be anonymous they can use "John Smith" or such, that will not lead to obscene attempts to be "cute".

Erik





List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List