Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/05/03 01:56
Read: times


 
#35653 - RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65
Hello Mr. Bart vanveldhoven (or whatever),

Mr. Rob Markham wrote:

The 24c65 does not have a hardware write
protect as the Fairchild , but It does have
a security write protect of 16 4kbit blocks.
But you can only set it once...You may have
accidentally set triggered it.

The security programing highlight can
be viewed at http://members.aol.com/cpu8052/24C65.jpg.

There is a Security command read you can
perform to verify this is your situation.
This will tell you if this is your problem.


Good luck,

Charles Bannister


List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List