Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/04/03 18:02
Read: times


 
#35622 - RE: unfortunately

Are you happy with the I2C routines you are using.

Don't worry about my I2C routines. They communicate with three other IC's on the same bus without any trouble.

If you are writing in C , Keil have some good I2C routines on their web site.
Too bad, I'm writing in assembler,
thanks anyway

List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List