Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/04/03 17:35
Read: times


 
#35618 - unfortunately
As you can read in the title: unfortunately.
I really thought that that would solve my problem.
I've put a 20ms delay between cycles, but the data still isn't written.
I've done a few other tests too, and it seems that I don't even get an acknowledge from the 24c65 after the adress is written.
it can't be busy, because even the adress of the very first byte I write isn't acknowledged.

any other suggestions??

Bart

List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Bart (or whatever)            01/01/70 00:00      
24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 24c65 upper addressing problem(s)            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: bart complaint            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Problem: 89c52 with 24c65            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List