Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/18/03 15:32
Read: times


 		 #36737 - RE: higher MIPS / Cygnal Bus
Peter:
Thanks for correcting me about the port 2 operation of the normal 51/52 when the MOVX @R0,A type instruction is used. I guess I got a little confused over the real reason that Cygnal had provided a separate SFR for this function.
Michael Karas


List of 22 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS / Cygnal Bus            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS / Cygnal Bus            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower price            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS / Cygnal Bus            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -80251            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -80251            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -80251            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: higher MIPS for lower -assembler / C            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List