| ??? 01/28/03 19:08 Read: times |
#37563 - RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? |
Sriharsha Vedurmudi wrote:
------------------------------- ...Coming to your caution, can you please elaborate on the harm, the environment can cause on these sensor lines. Its nothing more than a meger contact (ON/OFF). What can go wrong? Harsha, Please THINK ! THIS IS THE REAL WORLD EVERYTHING GOES WRONG. Is this a critical system ? YES. How should it fail safe ? How do I monitor sensors to make sure they are still valid ? Will it handle the idiot who tests the system with a Megger (earth leakage tester) Will it handle an idiot that connects it to a three phase supply ? How will you screen for conducted interference, how do you stop your cables to the sensor from radiating ? Think of the most crazy faults you can. THEN you can discount them, but only when you have thought hard about them. Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1489 and 7406 good Enough? YES! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 1489 and 7406 good Enough? YES! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is MCT2E better? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Is MCT2E better? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



