| ??? 01/29/03 18:11 Read: times |
#37675 - Is MCT2E better? |
I've given the design a fair thought today and as I was going through the datasheet of MCT2E opto-coupler, I understood that it can be used as well for interfacing the 24v Contact sensors to my system with an added advantage of opto-isolation. So, Can I use the MCT2E instead of 1489 (level translator) and get both the advantages?
REgards, Harsha. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1489 and 7406 good Enough? YES! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 1489 and 7406 good Enough? YES! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is MCT2E better? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Is MCT2E better? | 01/01/70 00:00 |