| ??? 01/28/03 19:39 Read: times |
#37571 - RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? |
Steve M. Taylor wrote:
------------------------------- How do I monitor sensors to make sure they are still valid ? ------------------------------- Really, how can I know if it the sensor is dead or alive, esp. when it is nothing more than an On/Off switch. ------------------------------- Will it handle the idiot who tests the system with a Megger (earth leakage tester) Will it handle an idiot that connects it to a three phase supply ? ------------------------------- In those cases, the sensors would get damaged and it can also be fatal to my system if they are not isolated (right?). So, I realised its better to provide opto isolation. ------------------------------- How will you screen for conducted interference, how do you stop your cables to the sensor from radiating ? ------------------------------- I did not quite understand this. The cables Radiate what? Is there something else I should take care in my System so that it does not get effected from any radiations? Regards, Harsha ================================== when everything fails, read the instructions/datasheet. :) ================================== |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1489 and 7406 good Enough? YES! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 1489 and 7406 good Enough? YES! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reading Sensors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Are we talking auto electrics here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is MCT2E better? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Is MCT2E better? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



