| ??? 05/22/03 13:26 Read: times |
#46375 - RE: USART vs. UART Responding to: ???'s previous message |
""... the only difference of asynchronous and synchronous data transfer is the presence of clock signal ..."
This is true. Note that RS232 covers both synchronous & async. "How do we implement asynchronous data transfer (without bit-banging) on standard-8051 device that only have UART port?" It's got a UART - use it! If you mean you want more than one async transfer but have only 1 UART, then you will either have to do it in software ("bit banging") or use external hardware. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART revised | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART revised | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: USART vs. UART revised | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: USART vs. UART revised | 01/01/70 00:00 |



