Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/22/03 13:26
Read: times


 
#46375 - RE: USART vs. UART
Responding to: ???'s previous message
""... the only difference of asynchronous and synchronous data transfer is the presence of clock signal ..."

This is true.
Note that RS232 covers both synchronous & async.

"How do we implement asynchronous data transfer (without bit-banging) on standard-8051 device that only have UART port?"

It's got a UART - use it!
If you mean you want more than one async transfer but have only 1 UART, then you will either have to do it in software ("bit banging") or use external hardware.






List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List