Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/23/03 02:34
Read: times


 
#46441 - RE: USART vs. UART revised
Responding to: ???'s previous message
M. Fahmy F. wrote:
-------------------------------
Andy:
I am sorry Andy I posted dumm question.. ofcourse we should use UART for asynchronous :)

This is the question revised:
"How do we implement SYNCHRONOUS data transfer (without bit-banging) on standard-8051 device that only have UART port?"


As far as I know all 8051 devices have an USART not an UART, so you don't nescessarily need anything extra for synchronous serial communications. Bot the "S" part is not very flexible. One problem is that the speed is locked to the xtal frequency, so you cannot use an external clock.

Read more in your favorite 8051 datasheet :-)

Best regards,

Mikkel C. Simonsen


List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: USART vs. UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: USART vs. UART revised            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List