| ??? 06/18/03 15:05 Read: times |
#48720 - RE: Negative Logic Responding to: ???'s previous message |
erik malund wrote:
------------------------------- Another reason, and I believe the right one, is that any memory chip I have seen (and they are not made exclusively for the '51s) use !OE and !W. but WHY ? My understanding was that it was easier to achieve a fast pull down than pull up. in the earlier logic families like DTL or TTL . Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic while on the subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic while on the subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| control lines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forgot something | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: forgot something | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ye can\'nae break the laws o\' physics | 01/01/70 00:00 |