| ??? 06/18/03 19:56 Read: times |
#48760 - RE: Negative Logic Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Well Michael, I for one do. The template I just pulled out of my toolbox is an R-542 (half-size).
I always felt that by carefully drawing the schematic (making it "pretty") contributed to the correctness of the design and ease of circuit board layout...not to mention making the schematics easier to read. Perhaps too taking the time to draw schematics gave you more time to contemplate what you were drawing and enabled you to make corrections before reaching the PCB stage. Thank God for electric erasers! Dennis |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic while on the subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic while on the subject | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| control lines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Negative Logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forgot something | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: forgot something | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ye can\'nae break the laws o\' physics | 01/01/70 00:00 |