Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/25/03 17:14
Read: times


 
#49344 - RE: Correction
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Rob Klein wrote:
-------------------------------
Utter crap!

To build something equivalent to the Philips 668 you would need at least:
- an 8085
- an (E)PROM (64K)
- a RAM (8K)
- an 8155
- an external UART
And then some...

I won't even begin to do the same comparison for Cygnal.

Rob.

dont jump to conclusion its 8155 not 8255.

8155 has

• High speed and low power achieved with silicon gate CMOS technology
• 256 words x 8bits RAM
• Single power supply, 3 to 6 V
• Completely static operation
• On-chip address latch
• 8-bit programmable I/O ports (port A and B)
• TTL Compatible
• RAM data hold characteristic at 2 V
• 6-bit programmable I/O port (port C)
• 14-bit programmable binary counter/timer
• Multiplexed address/data bus
• Direct interface with MSM80C85AH
• 40-pin Plastic DIP


very eager to prove me wrong huh.


abhishek


List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
multiple use of a port in at89c51            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: multiple use of a port in at89c51            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: multiple use of a port in at89c51            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE:8085 MCU            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE:8085 MCU            01/01/70 00:00      
         MCU or CPU?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    RE: Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: multiple use of a port in at89c51            01/01/70 00:00      
      What about bus contention?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: What about bus contention?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: What about bus contention?            01/01/70 00:00      
               power on reset POR            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: What about bus contention?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: What about bus contention?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: What about bus contention?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List