| ??? 07/01/03 17:29 Read: times |
#49798 - RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"After ten hours running, the clock running 10 sec faster than my watch. (which means, 1 sec/hour...) "
Not bad. For a start. OK fellow members have given professional solutions. Here is a quick and dirty one : Now that you know you are gaining 1 sec per hour, why not just adjust this 1 sec every hour in coding ? Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 |