| ??? 07/01/03 21:07 Read: times |
#49813 - RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Most of the world's power company's correct for the time. They have been doing this for the last fifty years.
Which I did not argue, I merely stated that I have heard that is not the case any more for the reasons given. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 |