| ??? 07/04/03 05:19 Read: times |
#50044 - RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Is it possible that you have made a time extension in the timer interrupt so as to count seconds? In that case, I suggest you can check if the basic timer interrupt occurs precisely at the time interval you specify.
A technique I use to maintain the correct time is to re-initialize the timer registers like so TL1 = -TICKTIME+TL1 & 0xff; TH1 = -TICKTIME >> 8; This compensates for the latency till the timer is reprogrammed. I am not sure if this will help you Jerson |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Simple Digital Clock ---89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Here comes the oscillator bible | 01/01/70 00:00 |