Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/10/03 17:01
Read: times


 
#50435 - RE: 89C51 and 80F51?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The programmer can erase and program the AT80F51..
Then, why do you ask about the 80F51 when the chip is AT80F51

I am not lying...
Who say you are?
I really don't know that.
what is "that"
And there is no 80F51 data sheet on atmel.com
No, because it is AT87F51 http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resou...oc1012.pdf

Erik


List of 24 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      
      DO NOT USE -> EVER            01/01/70 00:00      
   With respect to Atmel...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: With respect to Atmel...            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 89C51 and 80F51?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List