| ??? 07/10/03 19:10 Read: times |
#50447 - RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Since 'F', as far as I can determine Atmels use, stand for OTP the 87 prefix(OTP) is what it should be. This does, in no way mean that Atmel always used it. However the AT prefix, is a general Atmel use and if you had included that in your post you would have had the answer yesterday.
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? real numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DO NOT USE -> EVER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| With respect to Atmel... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: With respect to Atmel... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51 and 80F51? | 01/01/70 00:00 |