Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/08/03 14:00
Read: times


 		 #56320 - pure 52 related.

In one of recent thread, Mr. Okuroglu has pointed out that 89C55WD is not working properly and laid out the reason very clearly. Unfortunately this msg has`t got much attention, probably thought to be a user mistake but NOT a compiler or a manufacturer mistake or found difficult to solve.

I am afraid the thread is going down in row in time but the problem still exist. If the problem is a 55WD
specific and is real one as it was claimed to be, is of a great importance to us(to 52 users). We all are potential 55WD users for our future involvements.

In past, I had given up using 55WD because of very similar reason as Okuroglu has met today.(I had posted the problem here)therefore I am very curious to know what`s the problem with this chip once I`ve been bitten badly

Since we ARE 8052 forum, and since this is a PURE 52 related, this 55WD specific problem shouldn`t be overlooked very easily.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Rustu




List of 37 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
   simple solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: simple solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
            New question for Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
               Bahri Okuroglu; not Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Bahri Okuroglu; not Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not ignored; stalled!!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Where is your example, Rusta?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Where is your example, Rusta? Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
         False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
            Example            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Example            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Lock bits - Bahri            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
               Compatibility Compatibility Compatibilit            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Where is your example, Rusta?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Andy and Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
         *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
               Over to you, Bahri            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
         two sides of a coin            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List