Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/09/03 13:55
Read: times


 
#56424 - RE: False assumption on substitution
Responding to: ???'s previous message


The very first sentence of the Atmel 89c55WD datasheet is `Compatible with MCS-51 Products`and I certainly know that as you pointed out, this doesn`t mean a working code is necessarily works with another family product.

55WD is pin compatible with 51 and also applies same instruction set. No any speed differance or anything that affect the way they work. Only have some additional features.

But the problem is not if they are compatible or not.
It is why 55WD cannot make a read from ROM.

We`d better wait till I or Bahri try a read from 55`s ROM in assembler.

Rustu


List of 37 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
   simple solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: simple solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
            New question for Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
               Bahri Okuroglu; not Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Bahri Okuroglu; not Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not ignored; stalled!!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Where is your example, Rusta?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Where is your example, Rusta? Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
         False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
            Example            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Example            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Lock bits - Bahri            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
               Compatibility Compatibility Compatibilit            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Where is your example, Rusta?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Andy and Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
         *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
               Over to you, Bahri            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
         two sides of a coin            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List