Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/08/03 14:58
Read: times


 		 #56327 - RE: pure 52 related.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Okay,
I cannot call that code "simplest" - it is C, it uses libraries and some headers. As result I am not sure that problem is "code uncompatible" but probably it is trouble of compiler/linker/user subroutines not shown?

List of 37 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
   simple solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: simple solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
            New question for Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
               Bahri Okuroglu; not Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Bahri Okuroglu; not Oleg            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Simplest example code            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not ignored; stalled!!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Where is your example, Rusta?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Where is your example, Rusta? Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
         False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
            Example            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Example            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Lock bits - Bahri            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: False assumption on substitution            01/01/70 00:00      
               Compatibility Compatibility Compatibilit            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Where is your example, Rusta?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Have we lost interest?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Andy and Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
         *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: *please* answer the LOCK BITS question            01/01/70 00:00      
               Over to you, Bahri            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: pure 52 related.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
         two sides of a coin            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List