| ??? 02/16/04 17:21 Read: times |
#64885 - RE: floating point numbers Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jill Flynn wrote:
------------------------------- and am not using a look up table like Steve said, as I was informed there would be too many values. Who cares what you were told, what did you WORK OUT ! Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers _ Rob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers _ Rob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers _ Rob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers _ Michael | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers _ Rob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why floating point numbers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lookup Table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which rubbish ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: floating point numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 |