| ??? 08/08/04 20:45 Read: times |
#75645 - RE: Triple redundancy? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
There always will be some bottleneck like this. The task is to place it in the most fault-proof place. (i.e. a handful of logic hates instead of software) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Triple redundancy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Triple redundancy_Of Course! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triple redundancy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triple redundancy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triple redundancy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single point failure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Reliability of BIT flags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correctness of any signal from outside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A sane portion of paranoia | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks - The thread can close | 01/01/70 00:00 |