| ??? 01/06/01 20:20 Read: times |
#7911 - RE: Hans van Pelt |
I have a proposal...
If you want to do this just for the address lines why don't you write a short routine that will translate the linear address you use in your program to the one you send to the SRAM module, in a way that you give the 0x0055 address through your assembly or c code and it will return/write the data from/to the coded location address. I believe it is more easy to understand when reading your source code. You don't have to know where exactly is everything, just use the right addresses. That way there is a coherency in source code and who cares where everything is ?? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kelvin Smith | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: panos kenterlis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: panos kenterlis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: panos kenterlis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve Taylor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Testboard with wires | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: How to PCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: How to PCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Testboard with wires | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Henk van den Broek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 |



