| ??? 01/10/01 07:50 Read: times |
#8053 - RE: (S)RAM addressing |
Hi Cory,
you can spend some hours to make the circuit pcb friendly. But you earn nothing but only your boss looking impatient to the deadline. I tried to do also with a CPLD. But now I found, its better to let the pin assignment made automatically for best fit into the CPLD, not into the pcb. Since then more unused macro cells available for improvements or bug fixing. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Kelvin Smith | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: panos kenterlis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: panos kenterlis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: panos kenterlis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Steve Taylor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Hans van Pelt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Testboard with wires | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: How to PCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: How to PCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Testboard with wires | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Henk van den Broek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: (S)RAM addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 |



