??? 11/08/04 18:57 Read: times |
#80713 - RE: 89c52 for output Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Erik,
Perhaps I am wrong (though it works fine in some thousands circuits I sold :) ) but using a transistor, the start delay becomes relatively longer while the high/low transition steeper. On the other hand, this is rather a low cost solution :)) Kerim |
Topic | Author | Date |
89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 |