??? 11/08/04 19:06 Read: times |
#80715 - RE: 89c52 for output Responding to: ???'s previous message |
it works fine in some thousands circuits I sold
Succesful testing does not prove the abscence of bugs, it proves the abscence of known bugs but using a transistor, the start delay becomes relatively longer while the high/low transition steeper. The transition does not necessarily become steeper as the transistor will turn on gradually and the length of the reset is irrelevant as long as it is long enough. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 |