??? 11/08/04 19:12 Read: times |
#80716 - RE: 89c52 for output Responding to: ???'s previous message |
On the other hand, this is rather a low cost solution
3 resistors, a capacitor and a transistor instead of a $0.66 chip. Ok, say you use the milkpail 1233, that will be the same as the transistor in insertion cost. Then we have $0.66 - (cost of transistor) + (insertion cost for 4 2 term components @ $0.10 each) + (cost of 3 resistors and a capacitor). WHERE ARE THE SAVINGS? Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c52 for output | 01/01/70 00:00 |