??? 11/09/04 17:24 Read: times |
#80827 - Correction Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
Amazingly AT89C51 works without any signal on P2.4 while AT89S52 requires a low at P2.4 Actually I meant to say "AT89S51" |
??? 11/09/04 17:24 Read: times |
#80827 - Correction Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
Amazingly AT89C51 works without any signal on P2.4 while AT89S52 requires a low at P2.4 Actually I meant to say "AT89S51" |