| ??? 11/11/04 16:55 Read: times |
#81056 - RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
well, you get what you pay for. I never had to complain about standard AT89C51 I used very much. Was always programmed by HILO parallel programmer. Everything worked fine, price was unbeatable. Perfect! All the mess came with ISP... Oh yes, but, at least they are very fast with admitting it, as opposed to Atmel, you usually see a problem in the errata before you discover it yourself. Must agree, by grinding of teeth... I said: "Nevertheless their support is lousy and offending"
You said: I'll let that one stand by itself. Yes, I have the nuts to admit, that I'm not always nice looking... Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: more to the above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel 'support' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Atmel: new AT89C51AC3 | 01/01/70 00:00 |