??? 01/06/05 11:59 Read: times |
#84441 - some correction Responding to: ???'s previous message |
hi,
Dennis Welbourn said:
I've used the Atmel AT89C51CC03 for CAN, it's controller is identical to the 'CC02. CAN macro of CC02 is a "lite" version of that used in CC01/03 due it contains only 4 message objects while CC01/03 have 15 ones. From programmer`s point of view it means that controller of CC02 has lower limit of messages` filters and shorter reception buffer length ("buffer block feature") than one of CC01/03. Regards, Oleg |
Topic | Author | Date |
how can i do a40kHz signal for 10 cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
whole numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
baud rates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAN baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tutorials and the Bible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks for the advice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actually... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And what about 2x Xtal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
40Khz for 10 cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run the numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Don't forget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Resonance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
12MHz would not work, either | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
22.118MHz for signal and CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAN CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAN and 'CC02 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
some correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Get 40,000 kHz T2 auto reload 12 mHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sounds like an application for a PCA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... and this IS an RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 |