| ??? 01/07/05 16:21 Read: times |
#84537 - Floating point math Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Hemant,
I think you are going to find the concensus is that floating point math is far too inefficient for an 8051/8052 derivative. These are µ-controllers, not µ-processors. Still, this isn't to say that it can't be done. I'll bet that putting your code in EPROM is an important first step (since there will be so much of it). Anyway, this subject has been discussed at length here on the forum. Do a search for "floating point" and you should find a trove of information. Good luck, Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| floating point calculations & eprom prog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look for a | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point math | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh please, not again! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appropriate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why floating point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why Floating point indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's real about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nothing more real | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but what about *real* ?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more human readable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| display real, of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fixed point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eval? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No FP in Keil Eval! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler or Assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why floating-point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please, more details! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating or Fixed ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |