| ??? 01/13/05 00:21 Read: times |
#84896 - more human readable ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Real" in the sense that the humans who set the limits are more likely to understand them. And, as I said, what is the point in struggling if you can afford time and space to use FP, assuming you don't get killed by rounding errors ?
Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| floating point calculations & eprom prog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look for a | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point math | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh please, not again! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appropriate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why floating point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why Floating point indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's real about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nothing more real | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but what about *real* ?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more human readable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| display real, of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fixed point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eval? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No FP in Keil Eval! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler or Assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why floating-point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please, more details! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating or Fixed ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |