??? 01/07/05 17:13 Read: times |
#84542 - Compiler or Assembler? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hemant Shitole said:
i am very much intrested in learning assembly langauge ... using keil compiler. Erik Malund said:
If you are using the eval version (I guess so because you want to make floating point and are using compiler)... Hemant, The thing that translates assembly language source code into machine code is called an Assembler; The thing that translates High-Level Language source code (such as 'C') into machine code is called a Compiler. Which do you actually mean? As you have the Keil tools, take a look at the diagram on p13 of the uVision Getting Started Guide - it shows you how the Compiler, Assembler, Linker, and other tools fit together in the Software Development Cycle. |
Topic | Author | Date |
floating point calculations & eprom prog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Look for a | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Floating point math | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh please, not again! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Appropriate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Floating point speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why floating point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why Floating point indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what's real about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
eg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nothing more real | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but what about *real* ?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more human readable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
display real, of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FP![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fixed point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
eval? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No FP in Keil Eval! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler or Assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why floating-point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Please, more details! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Floating or Fixed ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |