| ??? 01/12/05 20:56 Read: times |
#84878 - FP Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
The issue is NOT whether a '51 can do FP for a given app, the issue is that, if the main purpose of the app is number crunching, the '51 should not have been chosen in the first place. There are occasions, when you can use the simplicity of FP, especially stuff which needs lots of transcendental functions, the FPlibrary can occupy less space than the LUTs. I've done FP loads of times,but then my systems are largely interfaced withn slow mechanical rigs. Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| floating point calculations & eprom prog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look for a | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point math | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh please, not again! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appropriate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating point speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why floating point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why Floating point indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's real about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nothing more real | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but what about *real* ?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more human readable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| display real, of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fixed point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eval? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No FP in Keil Eval! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler or Assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why floating-point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please, more details! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Floating or Fixed ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |