| ??? 01/24/01 13:44 Read: times |
#8588 - RE: which 8051 C compiler again again |
I have looked at the Hi-tech, but excluded it from my initial test because their demo is "limited to 500 lines of generated assembler or 512 bytes, whichever is less".
The reason why I dont test for runtime is that I specifically set all optimizer options towards small code size. Code size will be the main issue in our application. Time critical parts of the app I will solve in assembler if needed. /Henrik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which 8051 C compiler again again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which 8051 C compiler is best.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problem if i use without a monitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
KEIL V4.01 or SDCC? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



