| ??? 06/07/05 14:24 Read: times |
#94451 - Statics init to zero Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
The code you posted the reference to is far from being illustrative.
Just consider the three #include's with nothing to include... When I see blank #include's on web pages, I assume that the filenames are enclosed in angle-brackets the the HTML interpretation is obscuring the filenames. This is the case with that web page. One shouldn't have to resort to this, but viewing the web page source yields: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdarg.h> Add the fact that m nor p[0] and p[1] is being initialized.
Are you sure this will produce consistent results? pz[], n, and m are static, so are initialized to zero. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| TEA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Endianess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Any recommendations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assess your requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Test vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| platform-dependent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why TEA? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you Mean DES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, DES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It would be better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Go here! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And what is your result? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not right? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I expected that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here are the results I am gettng | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Michael is right: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MS Visual C. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recipe for success | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problem with "standard implementation".. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example for the user | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What else? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I noticed that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Statics init to zero | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Didn't search first? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's easy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Useful fast shift and roll functions | 01/01/70 00:00 |