??? 06/07/05 14:26 Read: times |
#94453 - ??? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
v[0]=0x23456789; v[1]=0x00000001;
k[0]=0x7364e829; k[1]=0x00000000; k[2]=0x00000000; k[3]=0x00000000; What about posting the ACTUAL code you are using both on PC(MSVC) and '51? And, if in doubts, you can also post the asm file the C51 compiler produced - that would be surely a definitive source of knowledge on how the compiler proceeded. Jan Waclawek |
Topic | Author | Date |
TEA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Endianess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Any recommendations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Assess your requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
platform-dependent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why TEA? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did you Mean DES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, DES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Here it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It would be better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Go here! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And what is your result? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not right? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I expected that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Here are the results I am gettng | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Michael is right: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MS Visual C. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Recipe for success | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
problem with "standard implementation".. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Example for the user | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What else? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I noticed that![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Statics init to zero | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code Problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Didn't search first? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's easy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Useful fast shift and roll functions | 01/01/70 00:00 |