Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/14/01 18:27
Read: times


 
#9988 - RE: Multipple processord with SPI?
Magnus Munthe wrote:
-------------------------------
Do I have to connect P1.4(SS) between uP's using harware-commando
to tell the slave that it is a slave, or is it enough to set up SPCR as slave.
I dont realy understand whats the meaning with P1.4 as 'SS'.
Can I, for example, force the uP to be a SPI-slave by set P1.4 to zero.?
------------------------------
Ok 'SS' is unknown but what is SPCR???
Better would be to study how in actual the communication is
established .Read Kennith j Ayala chap 11 every thing has
been explained there with example.It depends more on what
stratagy you adopt.Do feel greatful to Craig that he has
spared you and not placed that big H/W sign on your posting.





have fun
sanjeev


PS:Dont post in acronyms and that too even if you yourself
dont know the full form, how do you expect us to predict it.
SS could be stack segment :)?



List of 10 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI :) ?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI :) ?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI :) ?            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Multipple processord with SPI?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List