| ??? 03/14/01 18:27 Read: times |
#9988 - RE: Multipple processord with SPI? |
Magnus Munthe wrote:
------------------------------- Do I have to connect P1.4(SS) between uP's using harware-commando to tell the slave that it is a slave, or is it enough to set up SPCR as slave. I dont realy understand whats the meaning with P1.4 as 'SS'. Can I, for example, force the uP to be a SPI-slave by set P1.4 to zero.? ------------------------------ Ok 'SS' is unknown but what is SPCR??? Better would be to study how in actual the communication is established .Read Kennith j Ayala chap 11 every thing has been explained there with example.It depends more on what stratagy you adopt.Do feel greatful to Craig that he has spared you and not placed that big H/W sign on your posting. have fun sanjeev PS:Dont post in acronyms and that too even if you yourself dont know the full form, how do you expect us to predict it. SS could be stack segment :)? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI :) ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI :) ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multipple processord with SPI :) ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Multipple processord with SPI? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



