Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/31/05 09:21
Modified:
  08/31/05 09:55

Read: times


 
#100324 - Exactly!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Oliver said:
The pulsed approach of 10msec pulses means you need good high frequency response, which means you are more prone to interference.

Exactly!! Think only about the huge harmonics sitting in the edges! You would put high frequency noise into your circuit where no HF would ever need to put its foot in.

I would also try filtering the inputs in hardware, as high frequency edges can alias down and cause all sorts of havoc.

HF noise often results in strange DC offsets, which are produced by demodulation at non linear acting pn-junctions. This can only be prevented by using a low pass filter at input. As the PT100 does not show any non linear demodulation effects, a simple low pass filtering at the point where the PT100 lines enter the board MUST therefore help to avoid all annoying demodulation effects.
No HF noise must reach the first amplifying or mulitplexing stage. Then, no strange DC offsets will be observed!

PT100 are deadly simple in removing any HF interference and related effects, because signal bandwidth is nearly DC. I never had any trouble with PT100 lines.

Kai

List of 37 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Analog mux for Pt100            01/01/70 00:00      
   Precision            01/01/70 00:00      
      Precision is the same?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Err            01/01/70 00:00      
            Inertia!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Precision.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Precision            01/01/70 00:00      
                     PT100 sensors            01/01/70 00:00      
   try another way, have a look at Linear T            01/01/70 00:00      
      No choice            01/01/70 00:00      
         it is still valid            01/01/70 00:00      
         The usual solution is...            01/01/70 00:00      
            As I said before            01/01/70 00:00      
               Whats the problem ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Acceptable limits            01/01/70 00:00      
                     hooking the PT100s up to differential in            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
                           4 wire ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Filtering MUST help. So, there's a mista            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Ditto, filtering must work            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Exactly!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Errm.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Look at existing products for ideas            01/01/70 00:00      
      that will give you more problems than it            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's not what I suggested            01/01/70 00:00      
            No chance            01/01/70 00:00      
               Again, not what I meant            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
   Switched Higher Current does help            01/01/70 00:00      
      I am interested, it took some search, fo            01/01/70 00:00      
      I heavily doubt this            01/01/70 00:00      
         not as to noise, but it does have the ef            01/01/70 00:00      
         higher current does help            01/01/70 00:00      
            You can use pulsing and filtering            01/01/70 00:00      
               It's the same as DC measurement            01/01/70 00:00      
                  How pulsing improves performance            01/01/70 00:00      
   Averaging(filtering) has the same effect            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List