| ??? 12/07/05 14:33 Modified: 12/07/05 14:34 Read: times |
#104823 - It DOES have to do with what you suggest Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Modern design" that you mention has nothing to do with placing and debugging the programs
Partially correct, it does not have anything to do with "debugging the programs", but it does have to do with "placing the programs" internally. Thus it DOES have to do with what you suggest, since in a "modern design" P0 and P2 are not available for memory access, they are used for I/O. If you in such a way can't debug more than 1%, well there are some, including myself, who score much better ! I did not discuss the value of your suggestion, that will depend on its use, just the fact that it can not be used in a modern design. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| how to debug without an ICE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible, sure, as easy no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| printouts-simulator-monitor-quasiICE-ICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Roll your own? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
| That's what I do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not pantyhose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| microscope and nuts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A nice self-made tool ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This, of course blows any modern design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What are we talking about ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It DOES have to do with what you suggest | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another low-cost tool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The LED | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| digital line with OSCOPE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems print is a very good choice for me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Make your own | 01/01/70 00:00 |