Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/19/06 17:42
Read: times


 
#124594 - yes
Responding to: ???'s previous message
When there is no key pressed, the inputs (rows) are high and the outputs (columns) are low. Pressing a button will pull the row low. Then I set each coulmn high in turn and see which one restores the row to a high state.
Is this backwards from the way I should be doing this?


the issue here is that any '51 input that float (in your case no key) will be high, thus you can not see "which one restores the row to a high"

Ok, your post does not make total sense to me, but let me try another way:
assuming that you select column and detect row (the reverse works just as well)

1) set all columns low, if no row low, no key
2) set all columns high
3) loop setting one column low at a time, check rows - any row low is 'key found'

Erik

List of 60 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
AND gate, INT0            01/01/70 00:00      
   Some thoughts            01/01/70 00:00      
      Should have stated..            01/01/70 00:00      
         Pullups            01/01/70 00:00      
            I'm a DUMMY            01/01/70 00:00      
   Port modes            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks, Kai            01/01/70 00:00      
      I was wrong again            01/01/70 00:00      
         are you too fast?            01/01/70 00:00      
            OK            01/01/70 00:00      
            does this look too fast?            01/01/70 00:00      
               depends on            01/01/70 00:00      
                  idea            01/01/70 00:00      
                     no            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but            01/01/70 00:00      
                           are you looking for \'pressed key high\'?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Detecting            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Ah, slightly different            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I tried to read what you posted            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          to clarify            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             overly complicated KISS            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                when..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             that will be all rows OR all columns plus one of t            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I'll try again            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   got it, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Heavily unsuited!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Well            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      OR            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Still unsuited...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            I Think....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               and now you will make a better one and ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  If it's bad, toss it!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               No shame at all!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            well, any decent code will do the two steps            01/01/70 00:00      
               too fast?            01/01/70 00:00      
   why to the hell ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Before sending somebody to hell, read carefully!            01/01/70 00:00      
         leave idle by timer            01/01/70 00:00      
            debounce            01/01/70 00:00      
   Other method            01/01/70 00:00      
      Oh            01/01/70 00:00      
   a language lesson and some general co0mments            01/01/70 00:00      
      Don't be silly...            01/01/70 00:00      
         as I said            01/01/70 00:00      
            Erik, please!            01/01/70 00:00      
               I said nothing about an AND gate            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Have fun...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  well,            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No, it does not            01/01/70 00:00      
                     You are right, Mark            01/01/70 00:00      
                        if so, wht are there two symbols ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           So what?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              because some of us want to show the intention            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Intentions            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    chip and function            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Sorry, but this becomes more and more ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          that a correct description makes the function            01/01/70 00:00      
      wait a minute...            01/01/70 00:00      
   I just recall            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List