??? 12/20/06 09:24 Read: times |
#129805 - In response to Neil Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Ok, thanks Neil. I sort of suspected that that was happening to me. How do you recommend creating your own flag? I'm a total newbie, but I recognize that using the Carry bit is a bad idea. Is doing:
my_flag: dbit 1 and then in the ISR/main code doing setb my_flag and clr my_flag a good idea? Is it smarter to do: my_flag equ 0x20.0 (bit addressable space) setb my_flag/clr my_flag? Thanks! D |
Topic | Author | Date |
the nature of the UART/steping through interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Uart is full duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART Question Part 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can not do both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In response to Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
go with the bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In response to Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In response to Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry for teh tripple post... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Search and Read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I hope Russell did not lead you down the garden pa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik - garden path indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm using interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Question about my interrupt driven UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You know the answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
answer is partially incorrect![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Can't single step on UART | 01/01/70 00:00 |