| ??? 12/20/06 18:59 Read: times |
#129843 - go with the bit Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Save that RAM.
The syntax is compiler dependant. The first way is better. Let the assembler keep track. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| the nature of the UART/steping through interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Uart is full duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART Question Part 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can not do both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In response to Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go with the bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In response to Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In response to Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry for teh tripple post... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Search and Read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I hope Russell did not lead you down the garden pa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik - garden path indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm using interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Question about my interrupt driven UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You know the answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
answer is partially incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can't single step on UART | 01/01/70 00:00 |