| ??? 03/11/07 01:51 Read: times |
#134696 - interesting they may be, but Responding to: ???'s previous message |
please do warn people about an "extremely large" bitmap.
The bitmap format you included is, together with msword ".doc" format, the worst bandwidth hog. At certain places in the world, bandwidth is an expensive thing and not yet "commoditized"... The bitmap is about 1Mb. That's a lot of data that will need to pass a 33kbps line in some countries... Try to use a compressed format. jpg, png or even gif. Or you could try a pdf format. as for your remarks: You may think you need to add more resistors. But that will not help you. You either need them or you don't. "thinking" you need them is no good way of trying to solve your problem. I can't remember it now, since I adjusted the resistor positions so much why fiddle around with those resistors. They are either needed or not. By moving your resistors, you are not proving anything. You must ascertain whether you need them or not. Then you do not need to move them. But you stil failed to answer following: have you been able to read your eeprom and verify that what you think you wrote to it, is actually present in the EEPROM? Sorry if I don't do a detailed analysis of your schematic, but time here is 2h45 AM, and I it will have to wait till morning.. Good night Patrick |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 board somewhat working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Give us a clue then.How does it partialy work?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HC AC ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you will most likely need pullups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pull ups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be more specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting tests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting they may be, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to verify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interesting they may be, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Checksum? CRC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You probably need an oscilloscope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry for asking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the first... (or last :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe my naging helped ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why EPP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why epp can be faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Epp requires a bit less logic and is WAY faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| about that schematic ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a matter of taste | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have to agree ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you may not have discovered this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you have to investigate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Amazed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What? | 01/01/70 00:00 |